What are three undesirable effects of implementing a water concentration program?

Implementing a water concentration program can lead to several undesirable effects as it often focuses on optimizing water usage in response to limitations or challenges associated with water resources.

One of the primary concerns is that this program can potentially result in less income for water utilities, especially if rates decrease due to lower consumption or reduced demand from customers. In times of drought, the strain on water resources is heightened, which can create financial difficulties for service providers who rely on steady income from usage fees. These conditions can lead to economic hardships for the communities that rely on these utilities.

Additionally, delays in developing new sources of water can emerge as a significant issue. Concentration programs may divert attention and resources away from exploring or expanding water sources, which can be crucial during periods of increased demand or scarcity. The overall societal impacts can be profound, as communities may struggle to secure adequate water for their needs.

In contrast, increased water quality and fewer customers served do not typically align with the outcomes expected from a water concentration program. Higher maintenance costs might be a concern, but they are not a direct effect of the concentration strategy itself. Therefore, the choice that encompasses the broader socioeconomic impacts of implementing a water concentration program is more accurate.